Editor’s Note: The next world war will be as “inevitable” as the other two.
If you live in or near a nuclear target you don’t have too many options. The least you can do is to know the 4 Signs of Evacuation.
When to Evacuate the Nuclear Target Areas
1 – When Your Electronics Stop Working (most of them – cars, phones, the grid…).
Most experts agree that the next nuclear war will start with at least an EMP. If one of the nuclear powers blasts a nuclear weapon 275 miles above the US it will produce an EMP that will basically send us, the Canadian and the Mexicans back to the Dark Ages. This is exactly what our enemy wants: to disrupt our communication and our ability to retaliate at full capacity. I have something you need to watch. It’s much better than I am at explaining the threat. Watch it and learn what you should fear most (Video), what an EMP effects and how you can protect your electronics, car, mobile phones, etc.
2 – When You Hear On The News That Another Nuclear Bomb Has Just Detonated
It doesn’t matter if it’s in the US, Russia or China… I’m thinking that when a nuclear bomb explodes we face 3 possibilities: a nuclear war which may involve the US, nuclear terrorism which means that the first explosion may be followed by another four, or human error like in 1956 when the US Air Force accidentally dropped two atomic bombs on North Carolina. If it’s the last case… then yes you’ve probably evacuated in vain. But the risk worth the effort!
3 – When a Nuclear Bomb Explodes a Few Miles Away, But Does Not Kill You.
If you’re not killed in the first few minutes, you can live a lifetime or die of cancer in the next few days. The longer you expose yourself to radiation (in the radioactive area) the lowest the chances to survive. Take your family and leave as fast as you can!
4 – When We Declare War on Another Nuclear Power or Vice-Versa.
Out of curiosity I searched for maps that would reveal nuclear targets in the United States, and I’ve posted them here for your interest.
The nuclear targets map shown bellow is one that I put together based on a number of factors while looking at other maps and data including military installations, nuclear weapons storage and
silo locations, bases, cities, etc.. No doubt I’ve missed a number of them, as well as other probable strategic locations, but it’s simply food-for-thought.
The large target ‘blob’ areas shown within the apparent sparsely populated regions of Montana, N.Dakota, WY/NE/CO represent known ICBM silos and nuke storage. Also, it may seem like there are more ‘red dots’ on the map than any probable nuclear attack, but believe it or not, there could potentially be more – given the many thousands of nuclear weapons in Russia (for example).
The nuclear target and fallout maps shown below are in the public domain. They vary with regards to nuclear proliferation and opinion of the day during the time they were published years ago.
Some maps are older than others and might not represent some of the changes which have occurred since their publish, but they are still interesting to examine, especially relative to one’s own location…
No one will win a nuclear exchange. History has shown that there have been psychopathic leaders – who had they possessed nuclear weapons, they surely would have used them. Are there still such people today? Of course there are. Lets hope that none of them ever are in control of ‘the button’.
The real effects surrounding the nuclear targets on any given map will depend on the type of nuclear detonation.
A ground burst detonation will not only pulverize everything within a given radius, but will also pulverize many countless tons of soil and dirt into the atmosphere. This will create a very dirty nuclear fallout situation.
2017 USA map of potential nuclear targets. Source: Reddit
An air burst detonation will still destroy buildings and everything on the ground from its shock-wave (within a blast radius), but it will not pulverize the soil and ground like a ground burst detonation would. This will result in less overall fallout in the atmosphere, however this fact is not to diminish the consequences…
In both circumstances, radiation (particles) will reach into the atmosphere and drift with the lower and upper level winds. While they will eventually fall out (some quicker than others), the effects could be long lasting.
There are many nuclear power plants located across the country. If the power grid (or part of the power grid) goes down during a nuclear exchange, there will additionally be a high probability that some (or many) of these plants will present a real and present danger if they cannot ‘scram’ in time – while critical systems are held up by diesel backup generators and dependence on a constant delivery of fuel to keep them running.
The Russians (and others?) are apparently ahead of the US with regards to EMP research and technology. Some believe that a nuclear first strike will ‘first’ involve a salvo of EMP detonations at high altitude (potentially via orbiting satellites, or launched from submarines or even off-shore freighters). This will likely take down the power grid, followed by a first wave of nuclear strike. The primary targets will likely be military installations, while a secondary wave will broaden in scope. A third wave would likely involve strategic bombers mopping up what’s left. The first and second wave could be all over in minutes to an hour (point being – it will be fast).
This article was written by Ken Jorgustin. If you liked it, you can visit his website at Modern Survival Blog
You may also like:
The Best DIY Traps Against Property Intruders
US Nuclear Target Map. Do You Live in The Danger Zone? (Video)
Livestock Animals You Should Start Raising For The Upcoming Economic Crisis
Meat Prices are SKYROCKETING. Here’s How to Get Ready
How to Use the Whole Animal (Whether You Raise Your Own or Buy It)
What about Alaska and Hawaii?
All the major islands will be hit. Oahu, Kauai, Maui, Big Island.
That makes no strategic sense considering Hawaii would be a huge asset to an invading country. No need to destroy it.
it would get hit for the same reason the Japanese hit it in World War 2 it’s the home base of the us Navys pacific fleet. they would have every reason to take out Oahu.
just Oahu.
I would think that Pearl Harbor would be targeted…probably nothing else.
Alaska has a couple of dozen radar sites which would be a target.
Alaska is not a refuge in this case..
What about Alaska? Would interior AK be safe – relatively speaking?
Areas in Alaska that would be targeted would be the Anchorage port, Elmendorf AFB and Fort Richardson, Fort Wainwright and Eielson AFB in the interior. Those would likely be air burst detonations to inflict the most damage possible to infrastructure resulting in very minimal fallout amounts. There are missile defense silos at Clear, Alaska but they may not be targeted because they would be fired to counter any incoming missiles.
There is not going to be a nuclear war. The “war” in Ukraine is a staged psyop courtesy of the cia, nsa, and other globalists that have turned their back on America. All part of the Great Reset.
Thank you. At least some of us can read between the lines!
i could agree with you, but Putin is not a part of the great reset. He is someone the elites want gone. I think the war was just a lucky break for the elites. I’d rather have Putin on my side against the elites. A nuke at the next WEF meeting would go a long way to getting our lives back in our hands
I think you are right, but the elites will use anyone for their gain.
William Holland, Are you saying the war in Ukraine is fake? If that is what you are saying, what makes you think that? Also what about all the people leaving Ukraine because of the bombings. And what would be the reason to fake a war. What would be gained by making it up.?
He did not say fake, he said staged. It is an intervention. Kinda like what the USA has been doing ad nauseam all over the globe for decades. An operation.
Does anyone know how I can find out where shelters are in my area? I know listings are out there if you know where to look. Thank you in advance.
https://davidmanthos.carto.com/builder/79289ba8-50b0-11e5-b2fb-0e853d047bba/embed?state=%7B%22map%22%3A%7B%22ne%22%3A%5B-88.87828793397149%2C-56.25000000000001%5D%2C%22sw%22%3A%5B83.9050579559856%2C652.5000000000001%5D%2C%22center%22%3A%5B-43.580390855607845%2C298.12500000000006%5D%2C%22zoom%22%3A1%7D%7D
Try this one, it’s National
Barking Sands on Kauai has missile silos. Oahu, Maui and Big Island have heavy radar and incoming missile detection infrastructure. Safest place in US for thermonuclear war is Arizona despite the potential fallout from Nevada and California. At least nuclear winter would solve global warming panic. Let’s hope for the ongoing escalation will lead to the inevitable sooner rather than later.
Is it true that old school carburetored cars are not affected by emp blast
If your car has an electronic ignition that would probably be fried so you would need a points ignition for it to survive and maybe spare fuses
What about this “EMP Shield” that I have seen advertised?
You have kind of messed up one aspect of what you said. Radiation from nuclear explosions decay fairly rapidly, compared to accidents like Chernobyl. If one is properly prepared, it will likely be better to shutter everything, and stay put inside for a few days, after which going outside will be safer for prolonged periods of time. That is, if you try to leave immediately, you will likely expose yourself to lethal levels of radiation from fallout and the like. Unfortunately, you recommended immediately getting out of the area, which may be exactly the wrong thing to do, depending.