If you live in or near a nuclear target you don’t have too many options. The least you can do is to know the 4 Signs of Evacuation. We will also discuss the global impact of nuclear war, highlighting how such events can affect not only America but the entire globe.
Introduction to Nuclear Threats
The threat of a nuclear attack has loomed over the world for decades, shaping global security policies and the way nations prepare for the unthinkable. The existence of nuclear weapons, ballistic missile submarines, and advanced nuclear capabilities means that the risk of nuclear war is never far from reality. A single nuclear strike could unleash catastrophic consequences, from immediate destruction to long-term radioactive fallout that endangers life and the environment for generations. The severe consequences of such an attack—ranging from mass casualties to the collapse of infrastructure—underscore the importance of understanding the risks and developing strategies for deterrence and mitigation. While the doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD) has helped prevent large-scale nuclear war, the presence of these weapons and the potential for escalation remain a constant risk, especially in regions where geopolitical tensions run high. Being informed about the risks and consequences of nuclear war is a crucial step in protecting yourself and your loved ones.
Historical Context of Nuclear Tensions
The Cold War era marked a period of intense nuclear rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union, with both nations racing to develop ever more powerful nuclear capabilities. The deployment of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) brought the world to the brink of nuclear war on several occasions, making deterrence through the threat of mutually assured destruction a central pillar of global security. Although the collapse of the Soviet Union led to a reduction in direct nuclear tensions, the risk of escalation has never fully disappeared. Today, modernization programs and the development of new technologies—such as hypersonic missiles and advanced nuclear reactors—continue to shape the nuclear landscape. Ongoing conflicts in regions like the Middle East, and the proliferation of nuclear weapons among additional nations, mean that the risk of nuclear war and its devastating consequences remain a pressing concern for the world.
Nuclear Capabilities and Strategies
The nuclear strategies and capabilities of major powers play a pivotal role in shaping the risk of nuclear war. The United States, Russia, and China each maintain formidable nuclear arsenals, equipped with a variety of delivery systems including ICBMs, SLBMs, and strategic bombers. Recent years have seen the development of new nuclear technologies, such as hypersonic missiles, which can evade traditional defense systems and further complicate deterrence strategies. While the principle of deterrence—preventing attack through the threat of overwhelming retaliation—remains central to nuclear policy, the ongoing development and modernization of nuclear capabilities by multiple nations increase the risk of miscalculation or escalation. Understanding the evolving nuclear strategies and capabilities of these nations is essential for assessing the risks and preparing effective responses to potential nuclear threats.
Introduction to Nuclear Threats
The threat of a nuclear attack has loomed over the world for decades, shaping global security policies and the way nations interact. The existence of nuclear weapons, ballistic missile submarines, and advanced nuclear capabilities means that the risk of nuclear war is never far from reality. A single nuclear strike could unleash catastrophic consequences, including widespread destruction, radioactive fallout, and long-term damage to both human life and the environment. The aftermath of such an attack would not only bring immediate devastation but also prolonged suffering due to radiation exposure and the collapse of critical infrastructure. Understanding the risks associated with nuclear weapons and the potential for fallout is essential for anyone concerned about their safety and the future of their community. Deterrence strategies, such as mutually assured destruction, have helped prevent nuclear war so far, but the risk remains, especially in regions where tensions run high and the threat of escalation is ever-present.
Historical Context of Nuclear Tensions
The Cold War era marked a period of intense nuclear rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union, with both nations racing to develop and deploy increasingly powerful nuclear capabilities. The introduction of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) meant that a nuclear war could be launched with little warning, raising the stakes for global security. The doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD) became the backbone of nuclear deterrence, ensuring that any nuclear attack would result in devastating retaliation. While the collapse of the Soviet Union led to a reduction in direct nuclear tensions, the risk of nuclear war has not disappeared. Ongoing conflicts in regions like the Middle East, coupled with the modernization of nuclear arsenals—including the development of hypersonic missiles and advanced reactors—have kept the risk of escalation alive. Today, the world faces new challenges as nations continue to develop and launch advanced nuclear weapons, making the need for effective deterrence and arms control as urgent as ever.
Nuclear Capabilities and Strategies
The risk of nuclear war is closely tied to the nuclear capabilities and strategies of the world’s major powers. The United States, Russia, and China each maintain formidable nuclear arsenals, equipped with a variety of delivery systems such as ICBMs, SLBMs, and strategic bombers. Recent years have seen significant development in nuclear technology, including the deployment of hypersonic missiles and the modernization of existing warheads and delivery platforms. Despite efforts at non-proliferation and arms control, the risk of nuclear conflict persists, particularly in regions where geopolitical tensions are high. Deterrence remains a central pillar of nuclear strategy, with nations relying on the threat of overwhelming retaliation to prevent an initial attack. However, as new technologies emerge and more nations seek to develop their own nuclear capabilities, the risk of miscalculation or escalation grows. Understanding these strategies and the ongoing development of nuclear weapons is crucial for anyone concerned about the potential for nuclear war and the steps that can be taken to mitigate its risks.
Nuclear Target Map: When to Evacuate
1 – When Your Electronics Stop Working (most of them – cars, phones, the grid…)
Most experts agree that the next nuclear war will start with at least an EMP. The detonation of an EMP could mark the beginning of a larger nuclear escalation, as even a limited strike can rapidly trigger a full-scale conflict. If one of the nuclear powers blasts a nuclear weapon 275 miles above the US it will produce an EMP that will basically send us, the Canadian and the Mexicans back to the Dark Ages. This is exactly what our enemy wants: to disrupt our communication and our ability to retaliate at full capacity. I have something you need to watch. It’s much better than I am at explaining the threat. Watch it and learn what you should fear most (Video), what an EMP affects, and how you can protect your electronics, car, mobile phones, etc.
2 – When You Hear On The News That Another Nuclear Bomb Has Just Detonated
It doesn’t matter if it’s in the US, Russia, or China… I’m thinking that when a nuclear bomb explodes—an event known as weapons detonation—we face 3 possibilities: a nuclear war which may involve the US, nuclear terrorism which means that the first explosion may be followed by another four, or human error like in 1956 when the US Air Force accidentally dropped two atomic bombs on North Carolina. If it’s the last case… then yes you’ve probably evacuated in vain. But the risk is worth the effort!
Related: Do THIS Before the Grid Goes Down
3 – What a Nuclear Target Map Can’t Show: Surviving When a Bomb Explodes a Few Miles Away
If you’re not killed in the first few minutes, the dose of radiation you receive after a nuclear explosion can determine your immediate and long-term health outcomes. Prolonged radiation exposure is especially dangerous for those who remain in contaminated areas, increasing the risk of severe health effects. The longer you expose yourself to radiation (in the radioactive area) the lowest the chances to survive. Take your family and leave as fast as you can, as radiation exposure can significantly increase your risk of developing cancers over time!
4 – When We Declare War on Another Nuclear Power or Vice-Versa
Out of curiosity, I searched for maps that would reveal nuclear targets in the United States, and I’ve posted them here for your interest.
The nuclear target map shown here is one that I developed using a variety of data sources, including military installations, nuclear weapons storage and silo locations, bases, cities, etc. No doubt I’ve missed a number of them, as well as other probable strategic locations, but it’s simply food for thought.
The large target ‘blob’ areas shown within the apparent sparsely populated regions of Montana, N. Dakota, WY/NE/CO represent known ICBM silos and nuke storage. These sites are specifically designed to deliver nuclear warheads to their intended targets in the event of a conflict.
Also, it may seem like there are more ‘red dots’ on the map than any probable nuclear attack, but believe it or not, there could potentially be more – given the many thousands of nuclear weapons in Russia (for example). Early warning systems are critical to detect incoming missile launches, allowing for a timely response and enhancing national security.
Related: Civil War Recipes That We Will All Be Eating Again Soon
The nuclear target maps and fallout charts shown below are in the public domain. These maps vary based on nuclear proliferation perspectives and the opinions of the time when they were published years ago.
Some nuclear target maps are older than others and might not reflect recent changes, but they remain fascinating to examine, especially when considering your own location.
No one wins in a nuclear exchange. History has shown us psychopathic leaders who, if they had possessed nuclear weapons, would likely have used them. Are such people still among us today? Unfortunately, yes. Let’s hope that no one ever gains control of ‘the button.’
The real effects shown on a nuclear target map will depend on the type of nuclear detonation. A ground burst detonation, for example, not only destroys everything within a certain radius but also hurls countless tons of soil and debris into the atmosphere, creating a severe nuclear fallout situation.
Related: Native American Tips for Living Off the Land
2017 USA map of potential nuclear targets. Source: Reddit
An air burst detonation will still destroy buildings and everything on the ground from its shock wave (within a blast radius), but it will not pulverize the soil and ground like a ground burst detonation would. In a ground burst, radioactive debris settles at ground level, leading to a more concentrated and immediate fallout in the local environment. This will result in less overall fallout in the atmosphere, however, this fact is not to diminish the consequences…
In both circumstances, radiation (particles) will reach into the atmosphere and drift with the lower and upper-level winds. While they will eventually fall out (some quicker than others), the effects could be long-lasting. The intense heat from a nuclear explosion can cause severe injuries, including third degree burns, even at considerable distances from the blast.
There are many nuclear power plants located across the country. If the power grid (or part of the power grid) goes down during a nuclear exchange, there will additionally be a high probability that some (or many) of these plants will present a real and present danger if they cannot ‘scram’ in time – while critical systems are held up by diesel backup generators and dependence on a constant delivery of fuel to keep them running.
Related: Amish Powerless Tools For A World Without Power
The Russians (and others?) are apparently ahead of the US with regard to EMP research and technology. Some believe that a nuclear first strike will ‘first’ involve a salvo of EMP detonations at high altitudes (potentially via orbiting satellites, or launched from submarines or even off-shore freighters).
This will likely take down the power grid, followed by a first wave of nuclear strikes. The primary targets will likely be military installations, while a secondary wave will broaden in scope. A third wave would likely involve strategic bombers mopping up what’s left. The first and second waves could be all over in minutes to an hour the (point being – it will be fast). In addition to the immediate destruction, there are other consequences of nuclear war, such as widespread environmental contamination and long-term health risks from radiation exposure.
This article was written by Ken Jorgustin. If you liked it, you can visit his website at Modern Survival Blog
Map Analysis and Interpretation
Interpreting a nuclear target map can provide valuable insights into which areas are most at risk in the event of a nuclear attack. These maps typically highlight key military facilities, missile silos, submarine bases, and major population centers that could be targeted due to their strategic importance. For example, regions in the Midwest, such as North Dakota, are home to numerous ICBM silos, making them potential high-priority targets. Submarine bases along the coasts, as well as major cities and infrastructure hubs, are also commonly marked. When analyzing these maps, it’s important to consider not only the immediate effects of weapons detonation at ground level but also the broader consequences, such as radioactive fallout carried by prevailing winds. The map shows potential zones of destruction and fallout, helping individuals assess their own risk and plan accordingly. As John Erath, a senior policy director for arms control, told Newsweek, understanding these maps is key to recognizing the risks and taking steps to protect yourself and your community. While no map can predict every possible scenario, they serve as a crucial tool for awareness and preparedness in a world where nuclear capabilities continue to evolve.
Conclusion and Final Thoughts
The reality of nuclear weapons and the persistent risk of nuclear war demand ongoing vigilance and preparedness. While the world has managed to avoid a large-scale nuclear conflict for decades, the modernization of arsenals, proliferation of nuclear capabilities, and shifting geopolitical tensions mean that the threat remains ever-present. Understanding the risks, interpreting nuclear target maps, and staying informed about global developments are essential steps in protecting yourself and your loved ones from the severe consequences of a nuclear attack. By remaining aware and prepared, we can help mitigate the risks and contribute to a safer, more secure world—even in the face of one of humanity’s greatest dangers.
Map Analysis and Interpretation
Interpreting a nuclear target map can provide valuable insights into which areas are most at risk in the event of a nuclear attack. These maps often highlight key military facilities, such as missile silos in the Midwest, submarine bases along the coasts, and major command centers. Locations like North Dakota, Montana, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming are frequently marked due to their concentration of ICBM silos and nuclear storage sites. Submarine bases in California and other coastal states are also prominent targets, given their role in the nation’s second-strike capability. When analyzing these maps, it’s important to consider not just the immediate blast zones, but also the potential spread of radioactive fallout, which can extend far beyond the initial detonation site depending on wind patterns and weather conditions. The map shows that while urban centers may be targeted for their population and infrastructure, rural areas with strategic military assets are equally at risk. Understanding these patterns can help individuals assess their own risk and make informed decisions about evacuation routes, shelter locations, and how to protect water supplies and food sources from contamination. By studying these maps and the logic behind nuclear targeting, readers can better prepare for the severe consequences of a nuclear strike and take steps to mitigate the risks to themselves and their families.
Final Thoughts
The persistent threat of nuclear war underscores the urgent need for awareness, preparedness, and informed decision-making. While no place can be deemed completely safe in the event of a nuclear strike, understanding the US nuclear target map helps individuals recognize high-risk areas such as missile silos in the Midwest or submarine bases along the coasts. The devastating yield of nuclear weapons, combined with the widespread radioactive fallout and prolonged radiation exposure, can cause severe consequences not only locally but also across the globe.
It is vital to stay vigilant about geopolitical developments involving nations like Israel and others with nuclear capabilities, as escalation can occur rapidly. The potential contamination of land and water supplies further complicates survival efforts after an attack. Therefore, having a well-prepared plan, including knowledge of evacuation signs and protective measures, is essential.
Ultimately, the best defense against nuclear war lies in global non-proliferation efforts, arms control, and diplomatic deterrence strategies that reduce the likelihood of weapons detonation. By staying informed and prepared, individuals can mitigate risks and enhance safety for themselves and their communities in these uncertain times.
You may also like:
The Best DIY Traps Against Property Intruders
How to Still Have Power When the Grid Is Down (Video)
Livestock Animals You Should Start Raising For The Upcoming Economic Crisis
Meat Prices are SKYROCKETING. Here’s How to Get Ready
How to Use the Whole Animal (Whether You Raise Your Own or Buy It)
What about Alaska and Hawaii?
All the major islands will be hit. Oahu, Kauai, Maui, Big Island.
That makes no strategic sense considering Hawaii would be a huge asset to an invading country. No need to destroy it.
it would get hit for the same reason the Japanese hit it in World War 2 it’s the home base of the us Navys pacific fleet. they would have every reason to take out Oahu.
just Oahu.
I would think that Pearl Harbor would be targeted…probably nothing else.
Alaska has a couple of dozen radar sites which would be a target.
Alaska is not a refuge in this case..
What about Alaska? Would interior AK be safe – relatively speaking?
Areas in Alaska that would be targeted would be the Anchorage port, Elmendorf AFB and Fort Richardson, Fort Wainwright and Eielson AFB in the interior. Those would likely be air burst detonations to inflict the most damage possible to infrastructure resulting in very minimal fallout amounts. There are missile defense silos at Clear, Alaska but they may not be targeted because they would be fired to counter any incoming missiles.
There is not going to be a nuclear war. The “war” in Ukraine is a staged psyop courtesy of the cia, nsa, and other globalists that have turned their back on America. All part of the Great Reset.
Thank you. At least some of us can read between the lines!
i could agree with you, but Putin is not a part of the great reset. He is someone the elites want gone. I think the war was just a lucky break for the elites. I’d rather have Putin on my side against the elites. A nuke at the next WEF meeting would go a long way to getting our lives back in our hands
I think you are right, but the elites will use anyone for their gain.
William Holland, Are you saying the war in Ukraine is fake? If that is what you are saying, what makes you think that? Also what about all the people leaving Ukraine because of the bombings. And what would be the reason to fake a war. What would be gained by making it up.?
He did not say fake, he said staged. It is an intervention. Kinda like what the USA has been doing ad nauseam all over the globe for decades. An operation.
Does anyone know how I can find out where shelters are in my area? I know listings are out there if you know where to look. Thank you in advance.
https://davidmanthos.carto.com/builder/79289ba8-50b0-11e5-b2fb-0e853d047bba/embed?state=%7B%22map%22%3A%7B%22ne%22%3A%5B-88.87828793397149%2C-56.25000000000001%5D%2C%22sw%22%3A%5B83.9050579559856%2C652.5000000000001%5D%2C%22center%22%3A%5B-43.580390855607845%2C298.12500000000006%5D%2C%22zoom%22%3A1%7D%7D
Try this one, it’s National
Barking Sands on Kauai has missile silos. Oahu, Maui and Big Island have heavy radar and incoming missile detection infrastructure. Safest place in US for thermonuclear war is Arizona despite the potential fallout from Nevada and California. At least nuclear winter would solve global warming panic. Let’s hope for the ongoing escalation will lead to the inevitable sooner rather than later.
Is it true that old school carburetored cars are not affected by emp blast
If your car has an electronic ignition that would probably be fried so you would need a points ignition for it to survive and maybe spare fuses
What about this “EMP Shield” that I have seen advertised?
You have kind of messed up one aspect of what you said. Radiation from nuclear explosions decay fairly rapidly, compared to accidents like Chernobyl. If one is properly prepared, it will likely be better to shutter everything, and stay put inside for a few days, after which going outside will be safer for prolonged periods of time. That is, if you try to leave immediately, you will likely expose yourself to lethal levels of radiation from fallout and the like. Unfortunately, you recommended immediately getting out of the area, which may be exactly the wrong thing to do, depending.
Daphne Molson, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, April 17, 2023,
The Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Active War Combat is internationally unlawful. Russia’s, North Korea’s, China’s, or any of Nato’s countries and any others, have no rights to release nuclear weapons, The International Criminal Court in the Hague in Holland has nuclear weapon international law and its legality made adamant. The danger of nuclear war to Earth and any countries or their humanity is so imminent may the wisdom of all countries leaders be unified into an international peace agreement that bonds all countries peace and prosperity. May sanctions on everyone be ended and all profit making benefiting all countries and all humanity flourish. May peace be made that no further abuse is done to any country, even Russia’s, whether Russia is a sinner and the International Criminal Court has issued a warrant for the arrest for its President Vladimir Putin. Invasion, genocide, atrocity, war crime, crimes against humanity and war attrition are serious abuse that billions have to cope with. Earth destroyed and become but dust unto dust of nuclear war abuse, Earth put out of orbit into an eternal darkness of Cosmos that will end all life and civilisation made for generations after generations, that is a graciousness of Cosmos given us all, is a foolishness of our world’s leaders. They can stop an end happening. Anyone anywhere care to protect Earth and all she is to everyone wishing and needing of her. May the International Criminal Court sentence any country, any persons within any country, of incurring nuclear war’s international criminal abuse if it still would be here after it is expected done. May Ukraine beg its country and its humanity be given sanctity from Russia’s inhuman invasion, genocide, atrocity, war crime, and its war attrition, for Russia will become abused severely if it continues to do abuse. Hope Ukraine wins a war battle victory and peace is made then by war battle coercion but it is made. That the beauty of Russia and its wealth and culture would be nuclear war destroyed is also a grief. It would have new leaders and it not accused so Russia would not be endangered for she has done criminal abuse. Peace come to billions soon. A mother Daphne Jane Molson who lives in Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
First map is wrong. Command infrastructure would be targeted Cheyenne Mountain is not a Target on the map. Nor are any of the missile silos in the midwest North Dakota South Dakota and Montana.
Obviously Washington State being a nuclear submarine base San Diego being a naval base Northrop being the main Naval Base and the shipyards and of course Washington DC are all prime targets. Map does not show Alaska and Hawaii, Hawaii would be a prime target being a main Naval Base also Guam. I think they would use their trident nuclear Torpedoes on the coast to produce tsunamis to take out the facilities. They would bring in there nuclear missiles that can fly over the South Pole and attack the US that way because America has no early warning system from the south